Monday, May 17
How Punjab was won
Akalis leds a virulent agitation seeking a Punjabi speaking state as the boundaries of provinces were being redrawn after independence but it took a tragic course as here language was inextricably mixed with religion, writes Inder Malhotra in The Indian Express
While language as the basis for redrawing India’s political map was accepted generally — even if it was enforced belatedly in the case of Maharashtra and Gujarat (IE, May 3) — Punjab remained a conspicuous exception to the rule. Since Partition in 1947, it had been a tri-lingual state, embracing what are now Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, and so it remained in 1956, in accordance with the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission that had rejected the demand for a Punjabi Suba (Punjabi-speaking state), backed by a vigorous, often virulent, agitation by its sponsors. There was, however, a powerful reason for the SRCs, and even more Jawaharlal Nehru’s, refusal to accept it.
For, this was the only case in which language was inextricably mixed with religion. The demand was confined to the Akali Dal, a party only of the Sikhs that claimed to be the “sole spokesman” all Sikhs even though a large number of them, especially those converts from the Scheduled Castes, called Mazhabis, supported the Congress which had no difficulty in defeating the Akalis at the polls. On the other hand, the Akali party and its towering leader, Master Tara Singh, had an impressive hold on the caste of Jats, dominating the Sikh community. No less formidable was their unshakeable control of the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee that runs all the Sikh shrines with their vast income. Before 1947, the Akali doctrine was that the danger to the Sikh faith was from Muslims. After 1947, the Hindus became the main threat to the Sikh Panth.
As his frustration increased, Tara Singh upped the ante. His movement became more and more violent, even militant. And then he gave it unabashedly secessionist overtones, confirming the opinion of those who had always said that Punjabi Suba was but a cover for a Sikh-majority state as a prelude to an “independent Sikh state”. However, if Akali communalists were inflammatory, Hindu communalists (largely though not entirely belonging to the Jan Sangh, the forerunner of the BJP), also acted irresponsibly and accentuated the communal divide. To undercut the demand for a Punjabi-speaking state, they persuaded the Hindu Punjabis to declare Hindi their mother tongue in the 1961 census — an issue complicated by complete disagreement between the two communities over the use of gurmukhi script.
After the bifurcation of bilingual Bombay in 1960, Akali fury escalated. Many others also felt that Punjab’s exclusion from the pattern prevalent in the rest of the country was unfair. Ajoy Ghosh, the last general secretary of the undivided Communist Party of India, went to see the prime minister and argued that the denial of a Punjabi-speaking state “smacked of discrimination”. “I envy you, Ajoy”, replied Nehru. “You don’t have to run the country and keep it in one piece. It is my responsibility to do so. Sikhs are a fine people but they are led by separatists and fanatics. I can’t hand over a state to them on Pakistan’s border. But such things are not permanent. As national integration proceeds, we will surely have a Punjabi-speaking state”. (Source: Ghosh to Nikhil Chakravartty, Nikhilda to this writer.)
It was clear that Nehru had decided to dig his heels in even while Tara Singh and other extremist Akali leaders were fuelling Sikh discontent and anger. The prime minister was happy that in Pratap Singh Kairon he had a chief minister in Punjab who was both competent and secular and thus able to contain the Akalis, if necessary by coming down heavily on them. By the start of the Sixties, however, Kairon had started losing his shine because of the greed and high-handedness of his sons (a blight that has felled many a politician in the subcontinent). Nehru earned some opprobrium for his constant defence of Kairon but eventually had to order a judicial inquiry against his favourite chief minister. Soon after Nehru’s death, Kairon had to resign because of the inquiry commission’s findings against him. The consequent political chaos in Punjab was the Akalis’ opportunity.
As it happened, another crucial change was also taking place in Punjab around the same time. From 1931 until then Master Tara Singh had been the uncontested, incontestable leader of the Akalis and, at one remove, of the Sikhs. No one could flourish in Akali politics without his patronage. Intriguingly, few of the protégés survived for long, though it usually remained debatable whether the follower had rebelled against Tara Singh or Masterji had cut him to size. In the early years of the Sixties, a new figure appeared on the Akali firmament that was different. As usual, he began as Tara Singh’s devoted disciple (the two went on alternate fasts for Punjabi Suba), later claimed near-equality with him and eventually replaced the redoubtable Master. His name was Sant Fateh Singh.
In 1965, Fateh Singh sent shock waves across the country by announcing that if Punjabi Suba were not conceded by a certain date, he would burn himself to death in the precincts of the Golden Temple. Well before the appointed date, the India-Pakistan War of that year loomed. Fateh Singh was persuaded to abandon his resolve. In return, Lal Bahadur Shastri, Nehru’s successor, appointed a cabinet committee to re-examine the issue, with Indira Gandhi as its chairperson. There is plenty of evidence to show that her mind was already made up in favour of accepting a Punjabi-speaking state. She appointed B.S. Raghavan secretary of the cabinet committee only after, in reply to her question, he had argued that the Sikh demand be accepted. Before the committee could complete its work Shastri died at Tashkent. As prime minister, Indira lost no time in deciding to trifurcate Punjab. She was much praised for her “boldness” and “maturity”. But the problem of dream city Chandigarh’s future remained.
She ruled that it would be the joint capital of both Punjab and Haryana, and itself be a Union territory. This was also welcomed as a “shrewd move”. In fact, it was to become one of the most explosive ingredients in the tragedy that overtook Punjab in the Eighties, and eventually took her life. Twenty-five years after her death the problem of Chandigarh persists.
While language as the basis for redrawing India’s political map was accepted generally — even if it was enforced belatedly in the case of Maharashtra and Gujarat (IE, May 3) — Punjab remained a conspicuous exception to the rule. Since Partition in 1947, it had been a tri-lingual state, embracing what are now Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, and so it remained in 1956, in accordance with the recommendations of the States Reorganisation Commission that had rejected the demand for a Punjabi Suba (Punjabi-speaking state), backed by a vigorous, often virulent, agitation by its sponsors. There was, however, a powerful reason for the SRCs, and even more Jawaharlal Nehru’s, refusal to accept it.
For, this was the only case in which language was inextricably mixed with religion. The demand was confined to the Akali Dal, a party only of the Sikhs that claimed to be the “sole spokesman” all Sikhs even though a large number of them, especially those converts from the Scheduled Castes, called Mazhabis, supported the Congress which had no difficulty in defeating the Akalis at the polls. On the other hand, the Akali party and its towering leader, Master Tara Singh, had an impressive hold on the caste of Jats, dominating the Sikh community. No less formidable was their unshakeable control of the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee that runs all the Sikh shrines with their vast income. Before 1947, the Akali doctrine was that the danger to the Sikh faith was from Muslims. After 1947, the Hindus became the main threat to the Sikh Panth.
As his frustration increased, Tara Singh upped the ante. His movement became more and more violent, even militant. And then he gave it unabashedly secessionist overtones, confirming the opinion of those who had always said that Punjabi Suba was but a cover for a Sikh-majority state as a prelude to an “independent Sikh state”. However, if Akali communalists were inflammatory, Hindu communalists (largely though not entirely belonging to the Jan Sangh, the forerunner of the BJP), also acted irresponsibly and accentuated the communal divide. To undercut the demand for a Punjabi-speaking state, they persuaded the Hindu Punjabis to declare Hindi their mother tongue in the 1961 census — an issue complicated by complete disagreement between the two communities over the use of gurmukhi script.
After the bifurcation of bilingual Bombay in 1960, Akali fury escalated. Many others also felt that Punjab’s exclusion from the pattern prevalent in the rest of the country was unfair. Ajoy Ghosh, the last general secretary of the undivided Communist Party of India, went to see the prime minister and argued that the denial of a Punjabi-speaking state “smacked of discrimination”. “I envy you, Ajoy”, replied Nehru. “You don’t have to run the country and keep it in one piece. It is my responsibility to do so. Sikhs are a fine people but they are led by separatists and fanatics. I can’t hand over a state to them on Pakistan’s border. But such things are not permanent. As national integration proceeds, we will surely have a Punjabi-speaking state”. (Source: Ghosh to Nikhil Chakravartty, Nikhilda to this writer.)
It was clear that Nehru had decided to dig his heels in even while Tara Singh and other extremist Akali leaders were fuelling Sikh discontent and anger. The prime minister was happy that in Pratap Singh Kairon he had a chief minister in Punjab who was both competent and secular and thus able to contain the Akalis, if necessary by coming down heavily on them. By the start of the Sixties, however, Kairon had started losing his shine because of the greed and high-handedness of his sons (a blight that has felled many a politician in the subcontinent). Nehru earned some opprobrium for his constant defence of Kairon but eventually had to order a judicial inquiry against his favourite chief minister. Soon after Nehru’s death, Kairon had to resign because of the inquiry commission’s findings against him. The consequent political chaos in Punjab was the Akalis’ opportunity.
As it happened, another crucial change was also taking place in Punjab around the same time. From 1931 until then Master Tara Singh had been the uncontested, incontestable leader of the Akalis and, at one remove, of the Sikhs. No one could flourish in Akali politics without his patronage. Intriguingly, few of the protégés survived for long, though it usually remained debatable whether the follower had rebelled against Tara Singh or Masterji had cut him to size. In the early years of the Sixties, a new figure appeared on the Akali firmament that was different. As usual, he began as Tara Singh’s devoted disciple (the two went on alternate fasts for Punjabi Suba), later claimed near-equality with him and eventually replaced the redoubtable Master. His name was Sant Fateh Singh.
In 1965, Fateh Singh sent shock waves across the country by announcing that if Punjabi Suba were not conceded by a certain date, he would burn himself to death in the precincts of the Golden Temple. Well before the appointed date, the India-Pakistan War of that year loomed. Fateh Singh was persuaded to abandon his resolve. In return, Lal Bahadur Shastri, Nehru’s successor, appointed a cabinet committee to re-examine the issue, with Indira Gandhi as its chairperson. There is plenty of evidence to show that her mind was already made up in favour of accepting a Punjabi-speaking state. She appointed B.S. Raghavan secretary of the cabinet committee only after, in reply to her question, he had argued that the Sikh demand be accepted. Before the committee could complete its work Shastri died at Tashkent. As prime minister, Indira lost no time in deciding to trifurcate Punjab. She was much praised for her “boldness” and “maturity”. But the problem of dream city Chandigarh’s future remained.
She ruled that it would be the joint capital of both Punjab and Haryana, and itself be a Union territory. This was also welcomed as a “shrewd move”. In fact, it was to become one of the most explosive ingredients in the tragedy that overtook Punjab in the Eighties, and eventually took her life. Twenty-five years after her death the problem of Chandigarh persists.
Friday, April 30
Saraswati Samman for Patar
In a state which is struggling to ensure that its people do not forget their mother-tongue, the announcement of a Punjabi poet, Surjit Patar having been chosen for the prestigious Saraswati Samman, came as a welcome news.
The Saraswati Samman instituted by the K. K. Birla Foundation, is an annual award for outstanding prose or poetry literary works in any Indian language and carries cash prize worth Rs 5 lakh and citation.
Fittingly, Patar announced to dedicate his award to the mother-tongue and ‘the tradition of Punjabi poetry and language that began with Sheikh Farid and Guru Nanak. “I hope that through my work, I can return small part of this debt during my lifetime,” said the soft-spoken poet.
Congratulatory messages poured down from Chief Minister to readers from all over the country and abroad. His phone did not stop ringing till the battery conked down and his fan page on Facebook was choc-a-bloc.
The suave poet takes all the adulation with a grace and poise that is contrary to the image of a boisterous Punjabi. He portrays this image through the dulcet tones in which he sings his poetry and the lyrical language he employs even in his ordinary day to day talk. This is reflected in his poems, obviously. Replete with imagery drawn from nature as well as local metaphors and motifs he interweaves in his poems contemporary concerns and personal impressions effortlessly.
This has ensured a distinct literary identity for Patar who enjoys immense popularity with general public and high acclaim from critics at the same time.
He is the third Punjabi writer after Harbhajan Singh and Dalip Kaur Tiwana to get the Saraswati Samman, other recipients of which include Harivansh Rai Bacchan, Vijay Tendulkar, Sunil Gangopadhyay among others.
65 year old Patar, who retired as Professor of Punjabi from Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, has six books of poetry to his credit. He has also translated into Punjabi three tragedies of Federico García Lorca besides adaptations of plays from Jean Giradoux, Euripides and Racine. The celebrated poet has also been the recipient of Sahitya Akademi Award and Panchnad Puruskar by Bhartiya Bhasha Parishad, Kolkata in '99 besides having been conferred DLitt by Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.
The Saraswati Samman instituted by the K. K. Birla Foundation, is an annual award for outstanding prose or poetry literary works in any Indian language and carries cash prize worth Rs 5 lakh and citation.
Fittingly, Patar announced to dedicate his award to the mother-tongue and ‘the tradition of Punjabi poetry and language that began with Sheikh Farid and Guru Nanak. “I hope that through my work, I can return small part of this debt during my lifetime,” said the soft-spoken poet.
Congratulatory messages poured down from Chief Minister to readers from all over the country and abroad. His phone did not stop ringing till the battery conked down and his fan page on Facebook was choc-a-bloc.
The suave poet takes all the adulation with a grace and poise that is contrary to the image of a boisterous Punjabi. He portrays this image through the dulcet tones in which he sings his poetry and the lyrical language he employs even in his ordinary day to day talk. This is reflected in his poems, obviously. Replete with imagery drawn from nature as well as local metaphors and motifs he interweaves in his poems contemporary concerns and personal impressions effortlessly.
This has ensured a distinct literary identity for Patar who enjoys immense popularity with general public and high acclaim from critics at the same time.
He is the third Punjabi writer after Harbhajan Singh and Dalip Kaur Tiwana to get the Saraswati Samman, other recipients of which include Harivansh Rai Bacchan, Vijay Tendulkar, Sunil Gangopadhyay among others.
65 year old Patar, who retired as Professor of Punjabi from Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, has six books of poetry to his credit. He has also translated into Punjabi three tragedies of Federico García Lorca besides adaptations of plays from Jean Giradoux, Euripides and Racine. The celebrated poet has also been the recipient of Sahitya Akademi Award and Panchnad Puruskar by Bhartiya Bhasha Parishad, Kolkata in '99 besides having been conferred DLitt by Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.
-JATINDER PREET
Thursday, March 25
Portrait of Guru Nanak Dev
Friday, March 5
ਭਾਰੇ ਭਾਰੇ ਬਸਤੇ

A little known aspect of the legendary poet Surjit Patar is his poetry for children. He has been writing poems for children all these years as he moved us with his more serious poetry but none of those have been published as yet. He is, however, planning to come up with an anthology now that he has sufficient poems to publish a book. Here is a sneak peek:
ਭਾਰੇ ਭਾਰੇ ਬਸਤੇ
ਲੰਮੇ ਲੰਮੇ ਰਸਤੇ
ਥੱਕ ਗਏ ਨੇ ਗੋਡੇ
ਦੁਖਣ ਲੱਗ ਪਏ ਮੋਢੇ
ਐਨਾ ਭਾਰ ਚੁਕਾਇਆ ਏ
ਅਸੀਂ ਕੋਈ ਖੋਤੇ ਆਂ ?
ਟੀਚਰ ਜੀ ਆਉਣਗੇ
ਆ ਕੇ ਹੁਕਮ ਸੁਣਾਉਣਗੇ :
ਚਲੋ ਕਿਤਾਬਾਂ ਖੋਲ੍ਹੋ
ਪਿੱਛੇ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਬੋਲੋ ।
ਪਿੱਛੇ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਬੋਲੀਏ
ਅਸੀਂ ਕੋਈ ਤੋਤੇ ਆਂ ?
ਚਲੋ ਚਲੋ ਜੀ ਚੱਲੀਏ
ਜਾ ਕੇ ਸੀਟਾਂ ਮੱਲੀਏ
ਜੇਕਰ ਹੋ ਗਈ ਦੇਰ
ਕੀ ਹੋਵੇਗਾ ਫੇਰ
ਟੀਚਰ ਜੀ ਆਉਣਗੇ
ਝਿੜਕਾਂ ਖ਼ੂਬ ਸੁਣਾਉਣਗੇ
ਤੁਰੇ ਹੀ ਤਾਂ ਜਾਨੇ ਆਂ
ਅਸੀਂ ਕੋਈ ਖੜੋਤੇ ਆਂ ?
Bhare bhare baste
Lame lame raste
Thakk gaye ne gode
Dukhan lag paye modhe
Aina bhar chukaya ae
Asin koi khote aan?
Teacher jee aange
Aake hukam sunaonge
Chalo kitaban kholo
Picche picche bolo
Picche picche boliye
Asin koi tote aan?
Chalo chalo jee chaliye
Jake seatan maliye
Jekar ho gayee der
Ki hovega pher
Teacher jee aange
Jhirkan khub sunaonge
Ture hi tan jane aan
Asin koi khalote aan?
Tuesday, February 16
Satish Gujral
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)